Peer grading does not necessarily violate students’ right to privacy as long as the grading process is done anonymously and the students’ personal information is not shared with other classmates.
And now, looking more attentively
Peer grading is a controversial issue in the educational field as it can be seen as a violation of students’ right to privacy. However, if done appropriately, peer grading can be a beneficial tool for both students and educators.
An anonymous grading process is crucial in order to protect students’ privacy. As long as the students’ personal information is not shared with their classmates and the grading is done blindly, students’ privacy rights are not violated. According to a study by Educational Researcher, “peer grading can be efficient and effective only if anonymity is ensured.”
Furthermore, peer grading can have numerous benefits for students. It can allow for a better understanding of the material being taught as students are encouraged to learn from one another. It also provides students with the opportunity to develop important critical thinking, communication, and leadership skills. Additionally, peer grading can save educators time as it allows for a quicker turnaround on grades and feedback.
Despite the potential benefits, there are also criticisms of peer grading. One issue is the potential for bias and inconsistency. Students may not have the same understanding or interpretation of the criteria being used for grading, leading to discrepancies in scores. Additionally, some students may have a personal bias or grudge against a classmate that may affect their grading.
In conclusion, while peer grading can be a useful tool in education, it must be done appropriately and anonymously to protect students’ privacy rights. It is important for educators to carefully consider the potential benefits and drawbacks before implementing peer grading in their classrooms.
Table: Pros and Cons of Peer Grading
Pros Cons
Encourages learning from one another Potential for bias and inconsistency
Develops critical thinking, communication, and leadership skills Personal biases may affect grading
Saves educator time Potential for intimidation or harassment
Quick turnaround on grades and feedback May create unhealthy competition among students
Encourages active participation by students Can be difficult to incorporate into certain subjects or assignments
Answer in video
The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) protects the privacy of students’ educational records. Schools are required to allow parents to inspect and review their children’s education records, as well as prevent inappropriate sharing of personal identifiable information, with exceptions. Violations of FERPA include denying a parent’s access to their child’s records or failing to protect the student’s personal information. Parents who believe their child’s school is violating FERPA can turn to an education lawyer to represent them at a hearing and ensure their child’s records are accurate.
Online, I discovered more solutions
In rendering their decision, the nine U.S. Supreme Court Justices unanimously agreed that peer grading does not violate a student’s right to privacy.
In rendering their decision, the nine U.S. Supreme Court Justices unanimously agreed that peer grading does not violate a student’s right to privacy.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in a narrowly focused decision released today, ruled unanimously that peer grading and students calling out peers’ grades in the classroom do not violate the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, also known as the Buckley Amendment. It reversed the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals in Denver (10th Cir.).
This paper argues that peer grading does not violate the privacy law. One argument in favor of peer grading is that it offers a student feedback on minor lessons, and it allows teachers to focus on curriculum, creativity, and grading major tests and papers (Grading).
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that the common classroom practice of students grading one another’s work under the teacher’s direction does not violate a federal law designed to protect the privacy of "education records."
The United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously in the case of Owasso Independent School District v. Falvo that the practice of students grading each other’s work and then calling out the marks does not violate the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) 1974.
The Supreme Court ruled today that the common classroom practice of students’ grading one another’s work under the teacher’s direction does not violate a federal law intended to protect the privacy of ”education records.”
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that students grading the papers of other students and even calling out the scores is not a violation of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
Falvo that the practice of students grading each other’s work and then calling out the marks does not violate the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) 1974.